Question:
My brother will hear voices talking to him and he will answer them but those around him can't here it.wat2 do?
emmanuel_vandmk
2006-09-12 09:24:08 UTC
My brother,45yrs since his childhood till date,he will talk to himself and answer questions.When he is been confronted he will say,he can hear voices talking to him.
The fact is he do not smoke at all.But when was a child he was playing with friends and this friends pull out a chair under him while he was about to seat on it.he fell down and hit his head on a sharp nail badly.
No body know if this is the reason for this condition.He has been given medication but still remain the same for years.How can help him.?I will appriciate your comment on this issue.Or what must i do?
27 answers:
Seneca
2006-09-12 10:19:41 UTC
Wow, you've received quite a number of answers and an "encyclopedia" from poster, avasamava, with "information" from "wikipedia", a questionable site, at best. Who needs to ask a professional in the medical field with avasamava around? LOL...and sarcasically meant, of course.



The answers you've received, so far, are divided into "black and white"...either your brother is "just fine, leave him alone because he functions well, otherwise" or he's completely "crazy".



I know from neither "diagnoses" because I am not there to see and to know.



There ARE mental health issues and problems. They DO exist. On the other hand, some of us are "wired differently" and those who are not wired differently are fearful of those who are, and these types are "gung-ho" to immediately put others on "medication" because they haven't "clue-one" about the mysteries and the depths of human abilities they are not familiar with and are against, for "whatever reasons" and come hell or high water.



I do not have any mental health issues, BUT, I have had ESP and other abilities since age seven. I did NOT have a physcial trama which preceeded the initial and overwhemingly obvious event which brought my abilities to the attention of myself and others. These abilities have saved my life and the lives of others, and they have brought guidance to me.



Only twice in my life have I heard "a Voice". It guided me both times. The second time, it told me what career path was meant for me. I followed the guidance and it was right on the money. I am wonderfully happy in my career choice. So...what can be so terribly "wrong" and "mentally ill" about this? Not a thing.



We must always keep in mind that there are mysteries inherent in all of us that we may never, fully understand, but, we must not condemn ourselves and others, right off the bat.



Your brother may or may not have problems, and his "voices" may or may not be part of whatever mental illness(es) he may have, if he has any at all.



Historical case in point:



Joan of Arc had the ability to "hear a Voice" and she persisted in following its guidance. As a result, she led the French army into victory over the English, helped the Frence hold on to France, and she helped the proper rulers of France...at THAT time...regain the proper sovereignty of France over the foreign rule of the English and/or the French puppets of the English. Whereas it's true that a certain bishop of Roman Catholic Church...the Church of my own choice....claimed, at that time, Joan was a "heretic" and/or a "witch", this merely goes to show us what improper "judgments" and "diagnoses" get us...waste and totally tragic errors...even from supposed "experts". As we know, the Roman Catholic Church had to realize Joan of Arc is a saint and the Church canonized her. She is SAINT Joan of Arc, and rightfully so!



By way of suggestion: Make note of what "experts" claim, make note of the latest findings in the medical field regarding your bother's "condition", but, keep in mind that we may never know the depths of our abilities and what "guides" us. In addition, show steadfast support to your brother and unconditional love for and to him.



All my best to you and your brother.
kevinrtx
2006-09-12 16:44:05 UTC
.







This is not the right way or the right place to diagnose such a problem, so please don't jump into any conclusions about what exact problem or condition he has.



It could be a neurological or mental health issue or a combination of both.



However, hearing voices is always a strong indication that there is a serious problem. His history of head injury could or could not be related. Also whether if this is life threatening to him or those around him is up to a professional to determine.



In the mean time, I think it is important to talk to him and make sure he is aware that an issue exists and that he needs to keep in mind the possibility of the voices not being true no matter how believable they sound to him.



Please seek specialized expert advice.









.
anonymous
2006-09-12 16:36:32 UTC
.

Clearly this is condition that will not go away, it's permanent.



NO ONE on this board has the ability, or knows enough about your brother to make a diagnosis from what you have told us. So ignore the LABELs others have given here, please.

Just make sure he sees a qualified DOCTOR.



Your brother will only get some relief from the medication that his doctor prescribes. Don't you worry so much. Your brother is not alone. Other people have it too.

His doctor can and will help.



You can help by being under standing, accept him just as he is; and encourage your brother to take his medication every day !!!



If he has problems affording his medication, and is a us Citizen there is a group to help with the expenses called Together Access

http://www.togetherrxaccess.com/home.html



HOW he got this way is moot; now, just worry about him taking his doctor precribed medication to help him as much as possible.



stw

.
anonymous
2006-09-12 16:42:11 UTC
Ignore the ignorant answer claiming Paranoid Schizophrenia.



It is more likely to be one of the many disassociative disorders, or borderline personality disporder, that are nowhere near as serious as paranoid schizophrenia.



It may even be schizophrenia, but no one who knows anything about this subject, or has had to deal with loved ones who suffer from personality disorders, would put paranoid in there without proper idagnosis



Without proper help no one can tell you any more than this.



also you don't say what meds he is on, clonazepam, mirtazapine, something else.



This SERIOUSLY needs to be checked out as many of the psych drugs that are prescribed are done so by lazy physicians who simply add new drusg to the treatment without removing old ones.



This can lead to incompatible drugs being taken, and to short term only drugs being taken long term, this can make things worse.
sanita1978
2006-09-12 16:30:46 UTC
Well you never mentioned if he has ever had a Cat Scan or MRI, or even if he has seen a psychiatrist. One of those would be your first step if they haven't all ready taken. Even if they have over time he may need a new one.



Good luck with your brother. The worst thing you can do is put off getting him some professional help ASAP.
anonymous
2006-09-12 16:29:47 UTC
My Grandma was Pscitsofrenic and she heard voices too, but didn't tell anyone until she was an adult. She called them the radio people. It's up to you and the doctor. I always humored my grandma. She couldn't live alone, becasue the voices were always negative and would tell her to do mad things. I don't know otherwise. The doctors have not conquered the mnd yet. There was a true story of one man who was able to control his mind, when he had a similar illness. You should watch Beautiful Mind. It is a tear jerker, but it shows how this man was able to control the images and voices in his mind.
Masta N8
2006-09-12 16:38:03 UTC
Maybe he has a gift of some sort. He can be talking to spirits and helping go towards the light, kind of like Ghost Whisperer. I say if he isn't hurting himself or anyone else just let him be.
kksay
2006-09-12 16:26:58 UTC
Get him to a Dr. immediately. Obviously, the meds he is on are not the right ones if they have not solved his problem. Or maybe he has outgrown them and needs different ones. Take him to a neurologist to make sure the nail didn't do any damage and then to a psychiatrist. Good luck to you and your brother.





Come on srini.....that little ditty is getting VERY old!!! Give it up!
Anne A
2006-09-12 16:28:10 UTC
Granted, he may have some kind of psyschophrienia but he also may have some clairvoyant ability. Ask him questions. Ask him what the voices are telling him. Then check it out; is anything factual? What if he has unleashed some part of the brain that can access the other side? It is possible you know.
seeitmiway32
2006-09-12 16:28:10 UTC
You're doing fine; make sure he takes his medication. In all probability he is schizophrenic. it's a mental disorder; I doubt the nail had anything to do with it, although I could be wrong. It is more common that you imagine because such people are kept at home, mostly.

Most schizophrenics are harmless. it's the paranoid ones who cause trouble.
Triskelion
2006-09-12 16:32:58 UTC
Sounds like Schizophrenia. Did you ever see the movie A Beautiful Mind?



Its all about that.
tlctreecare
2006-09-12 16:31:03 UTC
Scitzphroenic people hear voices and thing talk to them.

It can be contorl to some degree with medication.

Get him some medical help.
srini
2006-09-12 16:25:48 UTC
A kind-hearted fellow was walking through Park and was astonished to

see an old man, fishing rod in hand, fishing over a beautiful bed of

lilies.



"Tch Tch!" said the passer-by to himself. "What a sad sight. That poor

old man is fishing over a bed of flowers. I'll see if I can help."



So the kind fellow walked up to the old man and asked, "What are you

doing, my friend?"



"Fishing, sir."



"Fishing, eh? Well how would you like to come have a drink with me?"



The old man stood put his rod away and followed the kind stranger to

the corner bar. He ordered a large glass of beer.



His host, the kind fellow, felt good about helping the old man, and he

asked, "Tell me, old friend, how many did you catch this morning?"



The old fellow took a big sip of beer and replied, "You are the fourth

today, sir!"
Ram S
2006-09-12 16:25:43 UTC
This is a medical question,, I mean if he has been like this for 45 yrs , havent u done anything about this all this time?
?
2006-09-12 16:29:33 UTC
Has he been examined by a specialist? Ask if he can have an MRI to see if there is something wrong in his brain. I hope he gets well.
Tricia P
2006-09-12 16:27:36 UTC
Sounds like a bit of skitzo... have him seen by a mental health provider in your area.
anonymous
2006-09-12 16:26:48 UTC
It's perfectly normal for crazy people to hear voices in their head.
Cary Grant
2006-09-12 16:27:09 UTC
Maybe he doesn't need help. If he is happy and he is managing his life alright, leave him alone. Maybe he is getting some good advice.
badkitty1969
2006-09-12 16:26:36 UTC
If your brother is happy with his voices, then leave him alone. As long as it's not hurting anyone.
peterpawan
2006-09-12 16:28:31 UTC
Nothing is wrong with him, he is just gifted. Read Midnight's children by Salman Rushdie ( if you are patient enough) and you'll see....
steve o
2006-09-12 16:28:13 UTC
buy a big lock for ur room and hide anything sharp!!!
swashbuckler82
2006-09-12 16:33:29 UTC
if he is happy & doesnt bother anyone put up with it.if not then put him away.
Tikcus
2006-09-12 16:28:34 UTC
OOOOO...MENTAL health department right away
kekeke
2006-09-12 16:30:26 UTC
Commit him right away.
ed
2006-09-12 16:32:22 UTC
avasmava is correct.
tampico
2006-09-12 16:26:25 UTC
just don't interupt...
?
2006-09-12 16:26:26 UTC
it sounds like he might have paranoid schizophrenia. that is a disorder where people specifically mention "hearing voices". he needs to see a doctor asap, bc sometimes these voices tell people to do things to themselves or others that are not morally or physically safe. there is medicine to help this.



Schizophrenia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Schizophrenia ICD-10 F20.

ICD-9 295

OMIM 181500

DiseasesDB 11890

eMedicine med/2072 emerg/520

MeSH F03.700.750

For other uses, see Schizophrenia (disambiguation).

Schizophrenia is a psychiatric diagnosis that describes a mental disorder characterized by impairments in the perception or expression of reality and/or by significant social or occupational dysfunction. A person experiencing untreated schizophrenia is typically characterized as demonstrating disorganized thinking, and as experiencing delusions or auditory hallucinations. Although the disorder is primarily thought to affect cognition, it can also contribute to chronic problems with behavior and emotion. Due to the many possible combinations of symptoms, there is ongoing and heated debate about whether the diagnosis necessarily or adequately describes a disorder, or alternatively whether it might represent a number of disorders. For this reason, Eugen Bleuler deliberately called the disease "the schizophrenias" plural, when he coined the present name.



Diagnosis is based on the self-reported experiences of the patient, in combination with secondary signs observed by a psychiatrist, clinical psychologist or other competent clinician. There is no objective biological test for schizophrenia, though studies suggest that genetics, neurobiology and social environment are important contributing factors. Current research into the development of the disorder often focuses on the role of neurobiology, although a reliable and identifiable organic cause has not been found. In the absence of objective laboratory tests to confirm the diagnosis, some question the legitimacy of schizophrenia's status as a disease. Furthermore, some question the status of schizophrenia as a disease on the basis that they do not consider their condition to be an impairment.



The term schizophrenia translates roughly as "shattered mind," and comes from the Greek σχίζω (schizo, "to split" or "to divide") and φρήν (phrēn, "mind"). Despite its etymology, schizophrenia is not synonymous with dissociative identity disorder, also known as multiple personality disorder or "split personality"; in popular culture the two are often confused. Although schizophrenia often leads to social or occupational dysfunction, there is little association of the illness with a predisposition toward aggressive behavior.



Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia are highly likely to be diagnosed with other disorders. The lifetime prevalence of substance abuse is typically around 40%. Comorbidity is also high with clinical depression, anxiety disorders, social problems, and a generally decreased life expectancy is also present. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia typically live 10-12 years less than their healthy counterparts, owing to increased physical health problems and a high suicide rate.



Overview

Schizophrenia is often described in terms of "positive" and "negative" symptoms. Positive symptoms include delusions, auditory hallucinations and thought disorder and are typically regarded as manifestations of psychosis. Negative symptoms are so named because they are considered to be the loss or absence of normal traits or abilities, and include features such as flat, blunted or constricted affect and emotion, poverty of speech and lack of motivation. Some models of schizophrenia include formal thought disorder and planning difficulties in a third group, a "disorganization syndrome."



Additionally, neurocognitive deficits may be present. These may take the form of reduced or impaired psychological functions such as memory, attention, problem-solving, executive function or social cognition.



Onset of schizophrenia typically occurs in late adolescence or early adulthood, with males tending to show symptoms earlier than females.



In 1893 Psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin was the first to draw a distinction between what he termed dementia praecox ("premature dementia") and other psychotic illnesses. In 1908, "dementia praecox" was renamed "schizophrenia" by psychiatrist Eugen Bleuler, who found Kraepelin's term to be misleading, as the disorder is not a form of dementia, premature or otherwise.



The diagnostic category of schizophrenia has been widely criticised as lacking in scientific validity or reliability, consistent with evidence of poor levels of consistency in diagnostic practices and the use of criteria. One alternative suggests that the problems and issues making up the diagnosis of schizophrenia would be better addressed as individual dimensions along which everyone varies, such that there is a spectrum or continuum rather than a cut-off between normal and ill. This approach appears consistent with research on schizotypy and of a relatively high prevalence of psychotic experiences and delusional beliefs amongst the general public.



The wider anti-psychiatry movement also often argues against the diagnosis, for example arguing that classifying unusual thoughts, feelings and behaviors as a medical illness in this way is unscientific, stigmatizing, and legitimises the social control of people whom society finds undesirable but who have committed no crime.



Although no common cause of schizophrenia has been identified in all individuals diagnosed with the condition, currently most researchers and clinicians believe it results from a combination of both brain vulnerabilities (either inherited or acquired) and stressful life-events. This widely-adopted approach is known as the 'stress-vulnerability' model, and much scientific debate now focuses on how much each of these factors contributes to the development and maintenance of schizophrenia.



It is also thought that processes in early neurodevelopment are important, particularly prenatal processes. In adult life, particular importance has been placed upon the function (or malfunction) of dopamine in the mesolimbic pathway in the brain. This theory, known as the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia largely resulted from the accidental finding that a drug group which blocks dopamine function, known as the phenothiazines, reduced psychotic symptoms. However, this theory is now thought to be overly simplistic as a complete explanation. These drugs have now been developed further and antipsychotic medication is commonly used as a first-line treatment. Although effective in many cases, these medications are not well tolerated by many patients due to significant side-effects, and have little effect on some individuals.



Differences in brain structure have been found between people with schizophrenia and those without. However, these tend only to be reliable on the group level and, due to the significant variability between individuals, may not be reliably present in any particular individual.



[edit]

History

Accounts that may relate to symptoms of schizophrenia date back as far as 2000 BC in the Book of Hearts, part of the ancient Ebers papyrus. However, a recent study1 into the ancient Greek and Roman literature showed that, while the general population probably had an awareness of psychotic disorders, there was no recorded condition that would meet the modern diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia in these societies.



This nonspecific concept of "madness" has been around for many thousands of years, but schizophrenia was only classified as a distinct mental disorder by Kraepelin in 1887. He was the first to make a distinction in the psychotic disorders between what he called dementia praecox (a term first used by psychiatrist Benedict A. Morel) and manic depression. Kraepelin believed that dementia praecox was primarily a disease of the brain2, and particularly a form of dementia. Kraepelin named the disorder 'dementia praecox' (early dementia) to distinguish it from other forms of dementia (such as Alzheimer's disease) which typically occur late in life. He used this term because his studies focused on young adults with dementia.49



The term schizophrenia is derived from the Greek words 'schizo' (split) and 'phren' (mind) and was coined by Eugene Bleuler in 1908 to refer to the lack of interaction between thought processes and perception. He was also the first to describe the symptoms as "positive" or "negative."2 Blueler described the main symptoms as 4 "A"'s: flattened Affect, Autism, impaired Association of ideas and Ambivalence. 78 Bleuler suggested the name schizophrenia, as it was obvious that Kraepelin's name was misleading. The word "praecox" implied precocious or early onset, hence premature dementia, as opposed to senile dementia from old age. Bleuler realized the illness was not a dementia, as it did not lead to mental deterioration and could occur early or late in life. Rather, schizophrenia led to a sharpening of the senses and a greater awareness of memories and experiences.



With the name 'schizophrenia' Bleuler intended to capture the separation of function between personality, thinking, memory, and perception, however it is commonly misunderstood to mean that affected persons have a 'split personality' (something akin to the character in Robert Louis Stevenson's The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde). Although some people diagnosed with schizophrenia may hear voices and may experience the voices as distinct personalities, schizophrenia does not involve a person changing among distinct multiple personalities. The confusion perhaps arises in part due to the meaning of Bleuler's term 'schizophrenia' (literally 'split mind'). Interestingly, the first known misuse of this word schizophrenia to mean 'split personality' (in the Jekyll and Hyde sense) was in an article by the poet T. S. Eliot in 1933.3



In the first half of the twentieth century schizophrenia was considered by many to be a "hereditary defect", and individuals affected by schizophrenia became subject to eugenics in many countries. Hundreds of thousands were sterilized, with or without consent, the majority in Nazi Germany, the United States, and Scandinavian countries.76,77 Many people diagnosed with schizophrenia, together with other people labeled "mentally unfit", were murdered in the Nazi "Operation T-4" program.



[edit]

Diagnosis

[edit]

Criteria (signs and symptoms)

Like many mental illnesses, the diagnosis of schizophrenia is based upon the behavior of the person being assessed. There is a list of criteria that must be met for someone to be so diagnosed. These depend on both the presence and duration of certain signs and symptoms.



The most commonly used criteria for diagnosing schizophrenia are from the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). The most recent versions are ICD-10 and DSM-IV-TR.



Below is an abbreviated version of the diagnostic criteria from the DSM-IV-TR; the full version is available here.



To be diagnosed as having schizophrenia, a person must display:



A) Characteristic symptoms: Two or more of the following, each present for a significant portion of time during a one-month period (or less, if successfully treated)

delusions

hallucinations

disorganized speech (e.g., frequent derailment or incoherence; speaking in abstracts). See thought disorder.

grossly disorganized behavior (e.g. dressing inappropriately, crying frequently) or catatonic behavior

negative symptoms, i.e., affective flattening (lack or decline in emotional response), alogia (lack or decline in speech), or avolition (lack or decline in motivation).

Note: Only one Criterion A symptom is required if delusions are bizarre or hallucinations consist of hearing one voice participating in a running commentary of the patient's actions or of hearing two or more voices conversing with each other.

B) Social/occupational dysfunction: For a significant portion of the time since the onset of the disturbance, one or more major areas of functioning such as work, interpersonal relations, or self-care, are markedly below the level achieved prior to the onset.

C) Duration: Continuous signs of the disturbance persist for at least six months. This six-month period must include at least one month of symptoms (or less, if successfully treated) that meet Criterion A.

Additional criteria (D, E and F) are also given that exclude a diagnosis of schizophrenia if symptoms of mood disorder or pervasive developmental disorder are present. Additionally a diagnosis of schizophrenia is excluded if the symptoms are the direct result of a substance (e.g., abuse of a drug, medication) or a general medical condition.



[edit]

Subtypes

Historically, schizophrenia in the West was classified into simple, catatonic, hebephrenic, and paranoid. The DSM now contains five sub-classifications of schizophrenia, the ICD-10 identifies 7:



(295.2/F20.2) catatonic type (where marked absences or peculiarities of movement are present),

(295.1/F20.1) disorganized type (where thought disorder and flat affect are present together),

(295.3/F20.0) paranoid type (where delusions and hallucinations are present but thought disorder, disorganized behavior, and affective flattening is absent),

(295.6/F20.5) residual type (where positive symptoms are present at a low intensity only) and

(295.9/F20.3) undifferentiated type (psychotic symptoms are present but the criteria for paranoid, disorganized, or catatonic types has not been met).

NB: Brackets indicate codes for DSM and ICD-10 diagnostic manuals, respectively. Some older classifications still use "Hebephrenic schizophrenia" instead of "Disorganized schizophrenia".



[edit]

Presentation

Symptoms may also be described as 'positive symptoms' (those additional to normal experience and behavior) and 'negative symptoms' (the lack or decline in normal experience or behavior). 'Positive symptoms' describe psychosis and typically include delusions, hallucinations and thought disorder. 'Negative symptoms' describe inappropriate or nonpresent emotion, poverty of speech, and lack of motivation. In three-factor models of schizophrenia, a third symptom grouping, the so-called 'disorganization syndrome', is also given. This considers thought disorder and related disorganized behavior to be in a separate symptom cluster from delusions and hallucinations.



Some symptoms, such as social isolation, may be caused by a number of factors. One possible factor is impairment in social cognition, which is associated with schizophrenia, but isolation may also result from an individual reacting to psychotic symptoms (such as paranoia) or avoiding potentially stressful social situations which may exacerbate mental distress in some people.



It is worth noting that many of the positive or psychotic symptoms may occur in a variety of disorders and not only in schizophrenia. The psychiatrist Kurt Schneider tried to list the particular forms of psychotic symptoms that he thought were particularly useful in distinguishing between schizophrenia and other disorders that could produce psychosis. These are called first rank symptoms or Schneiderian first rank symptoms and include delusions of being controlled by an external force, the belief that thoughts are being inserted or withdrawn from your conscious mind, the belief that your thoughts are being broadcast to other people and hearing hallucinated voices which comment on your thoughts or actions, or may have a conversation with other hallucinated voices. As with other diagnostic methods, the reliability of 'first rank symptoms' has been questioned4, although they remain in use as diagnostic criteria in many countries.



[edit]

Diagnostic issues and controversies

It has been argued that the diagnostic approach to schizophrenia is flawed, as it relies on an assumption of a clear dividing line between what is considered to be mental illness (fulfilling the diagnostic criteria) and mental health (not fulfilling the criteria). Recently it has been argued, notably by psychiatrist Jim van Os and psychologist Richard Bentall, that this makes little sense, as studies have shown that many people have psychotic experiences5 65 and have delusion-like ideas67 without becoming distressed, disabled or diagnosable by the categorical system (potentially because they interpret their experiences in more positive ways, or hold more pragmatic and commonly accepted beliefs).



Of particular concern is that the decision as to whether a symptom is present is a subjective decision by the person making the diagnosis or relies on an incoherent definition (for example, see the entries on delusions and thought disorder for a discussion of this issue). More recently, it has been argued that psychotic symptoms are not a good basis for making a diagnosis of schizophrenia as "psychosis is the 'fever' of mental illness — a serious but nonspecific indicator".6



Perhaps because of these factors, studies examining the diagnosis of schizophrenia have typically shown relatively low or inconsistent levels of diagnostic reliability. Most famously, David Rosenhan's 1972 study, published as On being sane in insane places, demonstrated that the diagnosis of schizophrenia was (at least at the time) often subjective and unreliable. More recent studies have found agreement between any two psychiatrists when diagnosing schizophrenia tends to reach about 65% at best7. This, and the results of earlier studies of diagnostic reliability (which typically reported even lower levels of agreement) have led some critics to argue that the diagnosis of schizophrenia should be abandoned.8



Proponents have argued for a new approach that would use the presence of specific neurocognitive deficits to make a diagnosis. These often accompany schizophrenia and take the form of a reduction or impairment in basic psychological functions such as memory, attention, executive function and problem solving. It is these sorts of difficulties, rather than the psychotic symptoms (which can in many cases be controlled by antipsychotic medication), which seem to be the cause of most disability in schizophrenia. However, this argument is relatively new and it is unlikely that the method of diagnosing schizophrenia will change radically in the near future.



The diagnostic approach to schizophrenia has also been opposed by the proponents of the anti-psychiatry movement, who argue that classifying specific thoughts and behaviors as an illness allows social control of people that society finds undesirable but who have committed no crime. They argue that this is a way of unjustly classifying a social problem as a medical one to allow the forcible detention and treatment of people displaying these behaviors, which is something which can be done under mental health legislation in most western countries.



An example of this can be seen in the Soviet Union, where an additional sub-classification of sluggishly progressing schizophrenia was created. Particularly in the RSFSR (Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic), this diagnosis was used for the purpose of silencing political dissidents or forcing them to recant their ideas by the use of forcible confinement and treatment. In 2000 similar concerns about the abuse of psychiatry to unjustly silence and detain practitioners of the Falun Gong movement by the Chinese government led the American Psychiatric Association's Committee on the Abuse of Psychiatry and Psychiatrists to pass a resolution to urge the World Psychiatric Association to investigate the situation in China.



Western psychiatric medicine tends to favor a definition of symptoms that depends on form rather than content (an innovation first argued for by psychiatrists Karl Jaspers and Kurt Schneider). Therefore, you should be able to believe anything, however unusual or socially unacceptable, without being diagnosed delusional, unless your belief is held in a particular way. In principle, this would stop people being forcibly detained or treated simply for what they believe. However, the distinction between form and content is not easy, or always possible, to make in practice (see delusion). This had led to accusations by anti-psychiatry, surrealist and mental health system survivor groups that psychiatric abuses exist to some extent in the West as well.



[edit]

Causes

[edit]

Genetic and environmental influences

While the reliability of the schizophrenia diagnosis introduces difficulties in measuring the relative effect of genes and environment (for example, symptoms overlap to some extent with severe bipolar disorder or major depression), there is evidence to suggest that genetic vulnerability and environmental stressors can act in combination to result in diagnosis of schizophrenia12.



The extent to which these factors influence the likelihood of being diagnosed with schizophrenia is debated widely, and currently, controversial. Schizophrenia is likely to be a diagnosis of complex inheritance (analogous to diabetes or high blood pressure). Thus, it is likely that several genes interact to generate risk for it75. This, combined with disagreements over which research methods are best, or how data from genetic research should be interpreted, has led to differing estimates over genetic contribution.



[edit]

Genetic

There is substantial evidence that the diagnosis of schizophrenia has a heritable component (some estimates are as high as 80%). Current research suggests that environmental factors play a significant role in the expression of any genetic disposition towards schizophrenia (i.e. if someone has the genes that increase risk, this will not automatically result in a diagnosis of schizophrenia later in life). A recent review of the genetic evidence has suggested a 28% chance of one identical twin obtaining the diagnosis if the other already has it9 (see twin studies), but such studies are not noted for pondering the likelihood of similarities of social class and/or other socio-psychological factors between the twins. The estimates of heritability of schizophrenia from twin studies varies a great deal, with some notable studies10 11 showing rates as low as 11.0%–13.8% among monozygotic twins, and 1.8%–4.1% among dizygotic twins.



A recent review of linkage studies listed seven genes as likely to be involved in the diagnosis of schizophrenia or the risk of developing diagnosis of the disease.12 Evidence comes from research suggesting multiple chromosomal regions are transmitted to people who are later diagnosed as having schizophrenia. Genetic association studies have suggested some strong candidate genes which may contribute to risk of getting the diagnosis.75 The strongest evidence points towards genes called COMT (involved in encoding the dopamine catabolic enzyme catechol-O-methyl transferase,13) dysbindin (DTNBP1) and neuregulin-1 (NRG1).



[edit]

Environmental

There is considerable evidence indicating that stressful life events cause or trigger schizophrenia.15 Childhood experiences of abuse or trauma have also been implicated as risk factors for a diagnosis of schizophrenia later in life.16 17 18



There is also consistent evidence that negative attitudes towards individuals with (or with a risk of developing) schizophrenia can have a significant adverse impact. In particular, critical comments, hostility, authoritarian and intrusive or controlling attitudes (termed 'high expressed emotion' by researchers) from family members have been found to correlate with a higher risk of relapse in schizophrenia across cultures.70 It is not clear whether such attitudes play a causal role in the onset of schizophrenia, although those diagnosed in this way may claim it to be the primary causal factor. The research has focused on family members but also appears to relate to professional staff in regular contact with clients.71 While initial work addressed those diagnosed as schizophrenic, these attitudes have also been found to play a significant role in other mental health problems.66 This approach does not blame 'bad parenting' or staffing, but addresses the attitudes, behaviors and interactions of all parties. Some go as far as to criticise the whole approach of seeking to localise 'mental illness' within one individual - the patient - rather than his/her group and its functionality, citing a scapegoat effect.



Factors such as poverty and discrimination also appear to be involved in increasing the risk of schizophrenia or schizophrenia relapse, perhaps due to the high levels of stress they engender, or faults in diagnostic procedure/assumptions. Racism in society, including in diagnostic practices, and/or the stress of living in a different culture, may explain why minority communities have shown higher rates of schizophrenia than members of the same ethnic groups resident in their home country. The "social drift hypothesis" suggests that the functional problems related to schizophrenia, or the stigma and prejudice attached to them, can result in more limited employment and financial opportunities, so that the causal pathway goes from mental health problems to poverty, rather than, or in addition to, the other direction. Some argue that unemployment and the long-term unemployed and homeless are simply being stigmatised.



One particularly stable and replicable finding has been the association between living in an urban environment and schizophrenia diagnosis, even after factors such as drug use, ethnic group and size of social group have been controlled for.19 A recent study of 4.4 million men and women in Sweden found an alleged 68%–77% increased risk of diagnosed psychosis for people living in the most urbanized environments, a significant proportion of which is likely to be described as schizophrenia.20



One curious finding is that people diagnosed with schizophrenia are more likely to have been born in winter or spring21 (at least in the northern hemisphere). However, the effect is not large and it is still not clear to scientists why this may occur.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...